Site logo

eWallstreeter covers "How Technology Must Grow Up"

ew_grow_up

eWallstreeter covers "How Technology Must Grow Up"

InvestorHub covers "Why 99.4% of venture capital firms fail"

InvestorHub

InvestorHub, a forum for serious investors to gather and share market insights in existence for over 14 years and over 455,000 Members, covers “Why 99.4% of venture capital firms fail”.

eWallstreeter covers "Boulevard of Broken Ideologies"

ew_boulevard

eWallstreeter covers "Boulevard of Broken Ideologies"

Business Funding Insider covers “Boulevard of Broken Ideologies”

bfi_boulevard

Business Funding Insider covers “Boulevard of Broken Ideologies

Fortune: Venture Capital is fixed

fortune-banner
With the wisdom only a reporter who has never worked a day in the innovation’s business, Dan Primack at Fortune in his daily email declares venture capital fixed. Of course I need to set him straight. What follows is my response to his declaration (posted at the bottom):


Venture capital is as fixed as our economy. Not!

Instead, venture capital is sinking deeper into a morass of meaningless indicators, with pundits desperately trying to extrapolate and juggle those past indicators to produce tantalizing foresight and headlines to keep them at the “leaderboard” of page views. Most ill informed about the greater reality.

And can you personally honestly claim to know anything about business (cycles) because you write about it? Or know about finance and economics because you write about it? I suggest you consult with those outside of "the base” of economic dysfunction at times.

Listen, solely by virtue of innovation's massive greenfield, venture capital should have outperformed, and still should outperform any other asset class to date in terms of returns. It has not, and will certainly not through the continued subpriming of risk deployed by venture capital. The only outlier returns (save for socioeconomic value) are produced by those who can afford to circumvent the prevailing “rule of subprime law” in venture (Paypal mafia anyone?). So, the few innovations that succeed today, do so not because, but despite venture capital’s debilitating risk profile.

Venture capital will be fixed once its model is aligned with the same kind of rigor of merit entrepreneurs in the marketplace are eventually faced with. You just think it is fixed because the never ending pull by innovation will always drag a few “lucky" firms out of their self-induced morass. But venture capital cannot be fixed when it continues to deploy greater-fool economics that allow VC firms and (on occasion) their LPs to reap rewards before the public painfully finds out most of these technologies have no renewable value that improves their lives.

Frankly, your statement on venture capital is as foolish as George W. Bush declaring the Iraq attack "mission accomplished”. Both of you ignore the big picture all too comfortably. With the exception you can absolve yourself at any time of responsibility of the impact of your declaration by simply declaring a new “cycle”. Ask Tim Draper, the inventor of the Draper Wave, how that is working out for him now.

I suggest you stop looking in the rearview mirror to declare the future of venture capital fixed, and realize that venture capital can only be declared fixed if the public (as a private investor, user and as an indirect contributor to many LP funds) believes it is an asset worth betting their future on.

Innovation will survive, venture capital in this form will not, and should not.


Below is the full text of Dan’s email on the state of venture capital.

--------------------------------
Venture capital is 'fixed'

Here are two basic facts about business cycles:

1. They exist, and

2. People often dispute #1, particularly in the midst of a prolonged top or bottom.

So it has been for venture capital since the dotcom bubble burst more than a decade ago, with everyone from entrepreneurs to grizzled VCs adopting defeatist language about the industry's "broken model." The worst came in 2010 when median 10-year performance turned negative and a slew of longtime institutional investors (particularly endowments) began to abandon all but a small handful of VC firms. If venture capital had always been a cottage industry, it had become that cottage's spare supply closet.

In 2013, however, the negative narrative flipped with ferocious speed: More IPOs, rising returns and broad-based success that included, but was not defined by, Bay Area Internet companies. The turnaround knocked nonbelievers upside the head with giant bags of money and will help enable the next great wave of innovation. Even if tech valuations sag or the stock markets sink, venture capitalists will have full wallets. By proving the cycle, 2013 has created something sustainable for 2014 and beyond.

Venture capital isn't required to start a business, but precious few companies are able to scale successfully without it -- something that even the most critical entrepreneurs seem to recognize. It's the difference between building an app that Facebook buys after eight months and actually building the next Facebook.

For quite some time, though, widespread access to that money and advice appeared threatened. Fewer and fewer firms were able to raise new funds, and most of them looked remarkably similar to one another. That may have been okay for a small subset of well-networked entrepreneurs within the "right" geography and discipline, but many more would be left out.

That's where 2013 came in. The headline was the high volume of IPOs, but the underlying story was the breadth of issuers and investors. For example, more than 40% of the year's offerings came from life sciences companies (a practice area that many generalist VC firms had begun to either deemphasize or eliminate altogether). Commerce also rebounded, for both digital issuers like Zulily (a Seattle-based flash-sale site for moms) and physical ones like Potbelly (a Chicago-based sandwich-shop chain). Also note the geographic diversity, which was buttressed by more traditional plays like San Francisco-based Twitter.

And the more diversity of industry and geography, the greater number of VC firms are typically involved. This is reflected in performance data from Cambridge Associates, which showed massive improvement in median returns between June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012. Not only for one-year internal rates of return (+48%), but also for five-year (+17%) and 10-year marks (+48%). That means more and more firms should be able to raise new funds, thus expanding the pool of funding sources for entrepreneurs.

Now it’s time for the big caveat: So far, institutional investors like university endowments and public pensions don’t seem to be playing along. A recent survey by Coller Capital shows that while these groups have become more optimistic about future performance – two-thirds expect annual returns for North American VC to top 11% -- a majority still plans to decrease VC fund exposure over the next several years. A similar survey from Probitas Partners showed a record 43% of respondents saying that they no longer invest in venture capital funds at all.

Maybe I’m just a hopeless capitalist, but I honestly do expect the spigots to loosen. It took institutional investors a while to wean off of venture capital after the dotcom crash, and a similar lag may be occurring here (albeit in the other direction). All of these folks can read the data. Now what they need to do is realize that it signifies the existence of a VC cycle, rather than an uptick on the descent toward oblivion. Entrepreneurs are counting on this epiphany.

Termsheet by Fortune can be found here.

eWallstreeter covers "Soccer Economics"

ew_soccer_economics

CNBC Fast Money's favorite website eWallstreeter covers "Soccer Economics"

Welcome to The Executive Office of the President

The White House

Very exciting for us. According to web site analytics software, we can now count a member of the executive office of the President - or the President himself, as a visitor to our blog. This after visits from Bill Clinton's office, and regular visits from members of the House and Senate.

While the fate of Renewable Economics™ is not dependent on the adoption by government, as we explain here, having the interest of the Executive Office would certainly smooth out and accelerate the transition to modern economics that benefit us all. We've come a long way, and are prepared to serve when called upon.

eWallstreeter covers "The Bitcoin Before The Horse"

ewall_bitcoin
CNBC’s Fast Money favorite website, eWallstreeter covers "The Bitcoin Before The Horse"

eWallstreeter covers "The Dish on Apple's Restaurant"

ewall_dish
CNBC’s FastMoney favorite website, eWallstreeter covers "The Dish on Apple's Restaurant"

Silobreaker covers "Why Dorsey is right and Twitter is wrong"

SB_Twitter
Silobreaker, an internet and technology company that offers products and services which aggregate, analyze, contextualize and bring meaning to the ever-increasing amount of digital information, covers "Why Dorsey is right and Twitter is wrong". Interesting contextual information they gleamed from the article, displayed in the screenshot under network on the right.

Rediff covers "Why Dorsey is right and Twitter is wrong"

Rediff
Rediff, (Nasdaq: REDF) one of the premier worldwide online providers of news, information, communication, entertainment and shopping services covers "Why Dorsey is right and Twitter is wrong"

Indian BusinessGyan covers "Why Dorsey is right and Twitter is wrong"

BusinessGyan

Indian BusinessGyan, The destination for Business Knowledge powered by a community of experts, covers "Why Dorsey is right and Twitter is wrong".

"Renewable Economics" filed as trademark

uspto-logo

We have now filed the phrase "Renewable Economics" with the Federal US Patent and Trademark office, which means we strictly enforce the use of that phrase in conjunction with The Venture Company as its inventor's brand. The enforcement of the mark precedes the occurrence on this web site. As a reminder, trademark notices have been added to every page on this web site.

Vinod Khosla carries our quote, on Twitter

Khosla_tweet

Renowned Silicon Valley venture capital investor Vinod Khosla shares a quote from our blog "Why Dorsey is right and Twitter is wrong" with his followers on Twitter. Some say imitation is the greatest form of flattery, and we are flattered. The meaning of the quote is deep, as we will explain in our upcoming book on the reinvention of economics.

Feeding 10 Billion covers "Don't Follow Silicon Valley"

F10B

Feeding 10 Billion covers "Don't Follow Silicon Valley”. Feeding 10 Billion is a not-for-profit undertaking committed to helping food-system entrepreneurs realize their goal of building sustainable companies that make an impact, create jobs and generate returns for investors.

Harvard Law blog covers "Why Google Is the Next Microsoft"

Harvard_law20130828

Alumnus fellow Doc Searls with the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University covers “Why Google Is the Next Microsoft

14,000 views on The State of Venture Capital

SOVC0304.001

Shortly after our country's 237th year of independence (on the 4th of July) we added another thousand views to The State of Venture Capital, which is widely heralded as the preeminent presentation on the state of innovation's arbitrage.

Less apparent yet damning to many purveyors in it, is how venture capital fails for exactly the same reasons why many of our other financial systems fail, a lack of a meritocracy that stems from a lack of universal freedom, we so brazenly brag about to the rest of the world. Buffoonery that can easily be fixed with a little economic diligence.

GigaOm covers "KPCB mea culpa"

Gigaom_kpcb

GigaOm covers "KPCB mea culpa", albeit Georges does not write "for" Thomson Reuters PEHub but is covered there at times.

Reuters covers "KPCB mea culpa"

pe_kpcb

Thomson-Reuters Private Equity Hub covers "KPCB mea culpa"

Georges to participate at Venture Alpha East

vcj_east_2013

Georges will participate on a panel and attend Thomson-Reuters’ Venture Capital Journal - Venture Alpha East conference in Boston, April 3rd - 5th, 2013.

VentureBeat covers "Apple's finite loop"



Prominent Silicon Valley technology publication VentureBeat covers "Apple's finite loop".

Reuters' PEHub covers "Are VCs still relevant?"

pehub_vcs_relevant

Reuters' PEHub covers "Are VCs still relevant?"

Rick's picks covers "The greatest lie of all"


Rick's picks, a site by Rick Ackerman that publishes stock, commodity, and mini-index trading recommendations and forecasts based on a proprietary technical analysis method that took more than ten years to develop and hone, covers "The greatest lie of all"

Georges' keynote at AVF rescheduled for 12/12/12

AVF2012_w600

Georges' keynote at Angel Venture Forum at the National Press Club in Washington, DC postponed due to superstorm Sandy has now been rescheduled for 12/12/12. Come hear Georges speak about the economics of innovation that ignite the need for innovation of economics. Register here.

CBC's Local Tech Wire covers "The evolution of Apple"



CBS' Local Tech Wire covers "The evolution of Apple"