Quantcast

Site logo

Economic innovation for a bright new world

The State of Debt

state_of_debt


This from a New York Times article: For years, the American financial sector borrowed and borrowed. Its obligations rose even more rapidly than consumers’. Both sectors were far more aggressive borrowers than the federal government. Now that has reversed. The Federal Reserve reported this month that the outstanding debts of both the financial sector and households fell in 2010, as they had in 2009.

Now if our government would get its act together of what its role is in a free-market (not free-for-all) economy, the trending would work out just fine.

Check out the article hereexternal_link_grey.

Comments

We fail because we lie

Many of us like to spread the belief that our destiny is in the hands of "The Economy", blissfully forgetting that we create and control said Economy.

The silly political rambling about our national debt and the raising of our debt ceiling compounds the realization that our government too has failed, along with our economy and our financial systems. Our systems fail, not our tactics.

We need to treat our country more like a company, and our country lacks a viable business plan, a binding compass. We need to stop lying to ourselves to prevent us from reaching our full economic potential.
Read the complete article...
Comments

Crazy Capitalism

  • An article by the Mises Institute from 2009 about Crazy Capitalism reminds me how the economic geniuses we elect are often not. No Greenspan, free-markets are not a free-for-all. Capitalism without a merit based arbitrage is a bold lie. [Links: Mises Instituteexternal_link_grey]
Comments

My book

The introduction to my book could not have been better written than by an article of July 16, 2009 in The Economist titled “What went wrong with economics”. The crux of which reads:

A broader change in mindset is still needed. Economists need to reach out from their specialized silos: macroeconomists must understand finance, and finance professors need to think harder about the context within which markets work.


Welcome to the mission of my upcoming book. [Links: The Economistexternal_link_grey]
Comments

Bullish on the U.S.

BlackRock, a $3 Trillion investment firm and a LP in Venture we have met with is bullish on the U.S.

We agree with Chief Equity Strategist Bob Doll that U.S. entrepreneurial capacity will continue to lead the world, despite the way we see a subprime financial system, or socialistic capitalism, suppressing innovation. Apple and Facebook are great examples of custodians of innovation that have escaped the wrath of Venture Capital and grown dramatically despite (not because of) the traditional playbook of Venture Capital.

I agree with Bob on some of the economics he mentioned, but remain a staunch critic of the deplorable and suppressive role of a defunct financial arbitrage. With a new financial system guiding innovation we could be doing a lot better. Yet our cultural capacity to innovate, despite the flawed economic principles of our financial system, escapes and keeps rising above its arbitrage. But looking inwards, as we have found out, is clearly not part of the interest or risk analysis of many financiers.

Interesting points:
  • U.S. productivity is "OK and better than lots of other places. Over the next 20 years, the U.S. work force is going to grow by 11%, Europe's going to fall by five, and Japan's going to fall by 17.”
  • Half of the 2009 stimulus program was "true stimulus" for the economy. What about the rest? “Call your congressman and find out”
  • “We face formidable long-term structural problems that make the U.S. less attractive than it otherwise might be.”
  • In 1995 the U.S. produced roughly 25% of the world's goods and services and in 2010, after 15 years that included a tech bust, a terrorist attack and a housing bust that triggered a financial crisis, the U.S. was still producing that same 25% of global GDP

Read the full article here: [Links: The Wall Street Journalexternal_link_grey]
Comments

Financial crisis inevitable

  • Mark Mobius, executive chairman of Templeton Asset Management’s emerging markets group, said another financial crisis is inevitable because the causes of the previous one haven’t been resolved. Amen Mark, as long as our financial systems are not free-markets and therefor by definition unflattened, the risk of implosion of a financial system eleven times the size of production remains severe. [Link: Bloombergexternal_link_grey]
Comments

The stock market is not a free-market

MW-AJ554_new_na_MD_20110405085505

Afraid of Apple's impact on the stock market will be too large the Nasdaq re-balanced its 100 index. So much for a free-market system that is supposed to be self-regulating. Shares themselves are a short-seller derivative of a company's value, and an index is nothing more than a derivative of a derivative. I pity the fool who invests in them.

Do you really need more proof that stock markets are artificial markets, of which you or "the market" have no control?
Comments

Consumer debt down to $11.4 Trillion

nyfedtrillion_custom
U.S. household debt — at well over $11 trillion — is still way higher than it was before things got crazy a few years back, according to numbers from the New York Fedexternal_link_grey. The decline in household debt has been driven largely by a fall in mortgage debt — which in turn has come largely from write-downs banks are taking on bad mortgages.
Comments

US World Debt

usa_ioy
This mapexternal_link_grey shows leading foreign holders of United States Treasury Securities (at end of period - Nov 2010). Grand total: US $4,346.8 Billion.

A clear signal as to why the government should stick to doing what it does best, govern the creation of new free-market systems, rather than infuse inefficient economic market constructs with more money and regulations. Because only efficient public markets can drive the recovery of the United States and wipeout this massive debt.
Comments

World Economies

Sweeping shifts in world economies, according to a study by Euromonitorexternal_link_grey:

WorldEconomies

• By 2017, China will become the world's largest economy, surpassing the United States • By 2012, India will overtake Japan to be the world's third largest economy • By 2012, Russia will surpass Germany to be the fifth largest economy in the world • Mexico also enters the top 10 by 2020, overtaking Italy.
Comments

What recovery

Comments

Infectious Stupidity

pkedrosky
I continue to be amazed by the infectious stupidity in Venture Capital, especially since its arbitrage is responsible for minus 4% IRR over the last ten years, with corporate innovation performance debunking all of Venture Capital’s pitiful excuses during the same period. You wonder about the motivations of the people who keep hanging on to that ineffective economic model.

I am told some Limited Partners in Venture listen to a fellow called Paul Kedrosky, an economist (and fellow at the Kauffman Foundationexternal_link_grey) who has also captured the hearts and minds of hungry Venture Capitalists chasing them.

I like Paul’s Infectious Greed blogexternal_link_grey and sincerely enjoy his observations on a broad range of subjects.

But economists are like forensic pathologists; great for finding the effect of death but inexperienced in the cause and conviction of the perpetrator. Cause establishes effect, not the other way around. Or put differently, deep hindsight rarely yields productive foresight - especially in the innovations business.

And so, a good economist is respected in the way we have to respect world renowned forensic pathologist Henry Leeexternal_link_grey, understanding and clearly communicating of his role as a scientist and leaving the conviction of the crime up to those who can trace the events, establish motive and analyze reason.

With that in mind you may be just as surprised as I was to have an intelligent guy like Paul on his Twitter account from my analysis of why funds smaller than $250M make no sense, allegedly refer to me as “asshole”, “tourist” and “idiotic” (see screenshot) to a VC that had sent it to him. Clearly I have hit a nerve, with Paul’s counter arguments to the article lacking. The deeper I dig into Venture Capital the stronger the odd protectionist behavior proves we have not seen the bottom of that dysfunctional barrel yet.

One would expect a more appropriate and susceptible attitude of VCs and those who advise them towards self improvement, considering the negative absolute IRRs and deplorable creation of Social Economic Value that has turned Venture Capital into the public disgrace of innovation and entrepreneurialism.

For the sake of a healthier financial system that can truly drive innovation and produce healthy returns for Limited Partners I will continue to hold those who benefit from its dysfunction responsible. With arguments.
Comments

Can we really blame the economy?

I am sick and tired of endless excuses. It is those excuses that throw the baby out with the bathwater and makes us lose our competitive edge. Excuses that hinge on the performance of our economy, but should it...
Read the complete article...
Comments

The crucial difference between derivative and value

So many so-called experts in the fields of finance, government, innovation and venture feverishly try to fix derivatives, instead of fixing the fundamental source of the problem. The difference between derivative and value is not always obvious...
Read the complete article...
Comments

Saving Silicon Valley

We can save the fantastic innovative capacity in this country and elsewhere when we apply the same intelligence of the way entrepreneurs build innovation to the way we fund it. Without a new free-market financial system in Venture be sure to strap in for a massive implosion...
Read the complete article...
Comments

Don't bite the public hand that feeds you

The Venture business does not and will not perform significantly better if it, or our government, does not change the market model it deploys...
Read the complete article...
Comments

Predicting the future is why macro matters

Venture Capital differs fundamentally from (other forms of) Private Equity in that it requires an extraordinary level of foresight and prescience. After all, one needs to believe in something that does not already exist and little proof exist it ever will - or is there?
Read the complete article...
Comments

Capitalism Without Merit Is a Bold Lie

And socialism without merit is a lie too, a hollow lie. Putting our economies in a box is the last thing we should be doing, it separates us further in an increasingly global marketplace that requires the opposite...
Read the complete article...
Comments

How to remove the systemic risk of our economy

Testament of the misalignment in our financial system is its size; an exorbitant eleven times the size of the businesses it represents. That means that the size, performance and characteristics of our financial system is far removed from the size, performance and characteristics of the underlying businesses...
Read the complete article...
Comments

The economy is not the problem

The sub-prime VC problem will remain when the economy recovers, if it is not aggressively perforated by people with real early-stage operating experience who understand that risk is the lifeline of Venture Capital...
Read the complete article...
Comments

Markets don't exist

With that title I just pulled the pacifier out of the mouths of marketers...and many of them will start crying. But smart business people know better...
Read the complete article...
Comments

Cheating platforms, bad for our country

By calling themselves platforms or marketplaces many technology companies mislead their participants and engaged in what I would characterize as false advertising. Not only did the suppliers expect to be treated equally and become successful based on a true meritocracy, buyers expected to get an untainted view of that meritocracy to make informed purchasing decisions...
Read the complete article...
Comments

Marketplace rules: look, don't touch

There is a lot of misconception about marketplaces. Marketplaces are interesting because, if implemented successfully, provide massive user adoption and winner-takes-all leadership positions. But marketplaces need to adhere to fundamental rules...
Read the complete article...
Comments

The Long Tail Continues

At The Long Tail Churchill Club event this morning Chris Anderson (Wired Editor in Chief and writer for the Economist), who claims ownership of the term, discussed his research and his upcoming book about The Long Tail. His speech reiterated some well understood findings at Amazon, Netflix, Rhapsody (all of which have been mentioned here before) as well as some esoteric analytical findings in which academia make an attempt to approximate the outcome of Long Tail markets with formulas. The Q&A session lead us into some of the business impacts of Long Tail markets. First he agreed with us, no business should create a Long Tail without a Torso. Second, new search technology customized to every individual usage (vertical search) is essential. Third, new "Taste-makers" of the world or micro-celebrities, vocalized by blogging about niche expertise, will fuel and direct the trust in The Long Tail. Meritocracy with democratic production. Interesting example mentioned was Lego, the toy company that changed its conservative marketing strategy (Pareto based) into a community marketing strategy, realizing better segmentation and margins can be derived from its very loyal community that continues to grow.

Our stance: Long Tail markets can succeed if:
1) The Torso exists and is successful in drawing the crowd
2) Long Tail demand is fed through Long Tail supply, creating a free-market
3) Arbitration is "owned" by the marketplace (not the company)
4) The marketplace offers sufficient transparency, to allow for discovery, not just search
5) The business behind the marketplace makes money on distribution (not aggregation)
6) The marketplace offers integrity, in pricing, use and abuse prevention

Read on for more information on The Long Tail in this blog series...
Comments

No Long Tail without a Torso

Investors are getting flooded with Long Tail startups. The Long Tail is the well documented phenomenon in which Amazon.com makes more money in selling books that are not(!) in the top 10,000 and creates controversy about traditional sales principles. Hundreds of examples exist before the introduction of the internet. But the Long Tail really only exists when there is a body attached to it. You go to Amazon because you find the most well known books, then you'll explore its creative variety. The body represents the highly targeted top quality that draws in the audience in the first place. So stop pitching Long Tails, where you rely on some undefined creative variety. Focus on making your numbers in the identifiable market, then benefit from the Long Tail to expand your selection beyond the traditional and constricted marketplace.
Comments
Made in the U.S.A. Made in the U.S.A. | All Rights Reserved © 1998 - 2012 by The Venture Company